<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Step over .com, more domain suffixes to come!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bryn.me/2008/07/01/step-over-com-more-domain-suffixes-to-come/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bryn.me/2008/07/01/step-over-com-more-domain-suffixes-to-come/</link>
	<description>Entrepreneur and Affiliate Marketer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:19:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryn</title>
		<link>http://bryn.me/2008/07/01/step-over-com-more-domain-suffixes-to-come/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 18:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internetismylife.com/?p=39#comment-67</guid>
		<description>Yeah I completely agree, I don&#039;t think it will be a few years before we start seeing any new ones, besides the .me that is coming out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I completely agree, I don&#8217;t think it will be a few years before we start seeing any new ones, besides the .me that is coming out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moserw</title>
		<link>http://bryn.me/2008/07/01/step-over-com-more-domain-suffixes-to-come/comment-page-1/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>moserw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 14:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internetismylife.com/?p=39#comment-65</guid>
		<description>Even I have been trying to think of some domain name that is personal and yet cool and powerful, but have not thought up of anything till now.  Anyways its going to be very expensive initially so might better stick with what we got right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even I have been trying to think of some domain name that is personal and yet cool and powerful, but have not thought up of anything till now.  Anyways its going to be very expensive initially so might better stick with what we got right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

